Photo: Glyn Lowe |
Every time I enter my local library I relive one of my most
pleasant early memories: my father taking me to Malvern Library in High Street when
I was about four. Surely I must have accompanied one or other of my parents to the
library before this, but on this memorable occasion he signed me up as a
borrower with her very own library card. I have never lost my reverence for
libraries since.
Church was another early experience of soul. It held a
quantum of familiar faces, school mates and their parents, choir members, a
community of sorts; but it dictated the hushing of the voice, the quelling of
the body’s tongue and momentum while grumpy Father Riley droned on to a God who
was depicted on the cross as, well, dead. Every five minutes I turned around
and checked the clock that hung over the back door. Pacing myself through each
segment, the lion’s share endured once communion swung into gear. That was
always a change at least, watching people shuffling obediently up to the alter
like prisoners queuing for lunch.
The library was different. Just as hushed, just as
respectful, but this time there was a point to the quiet, enabling a very
different kind of communion with an equally absent presence. It was the sound of a hundred minds encountering the
bright imagination of an author via the words on the page. A hundred small adventures, a hundred
serendipitous discoveries, a hundred love affairs with the written word being
carried on silently in this homely, local place that nevertheless offered many windows to the wider world,
like the magic windows of Play School.
But discovering books was as sensual as it was abstracted. When
you pulled the covers of the books back, their spines cracked and the opaque
plastic on the covers broke free with a squishing noise. When you took the
books to be checked out, the librarian pressed each one against a grey metal
machine that recorded the date of issue. The deep clunky sound this made
expressed the most complete satisfaction, and seemed to deliver each book to me
alone with a unique authority.
I soon became addicted to books. This was my weakness and my
strength. I did not always attend to the present book closely enough; I was
thinking of the next one. While we were still at the house in Manning Road, after a visit to the library I
would sit on the step between the kitchen and the tiny sunroom and go through
my stash. It had to be at least five at a time. I swallowed them like Tic Tacs.
At first they were picture books but it didn’t take me long to graduate to the
proper books with chapters that belonged on the freestanding shelving in the
middle of the children’s book section, a large sunny room with child-sized
reading benches set at the perfect angle for comfortable perusing.
It was the serendipitous find I craved. I still go into
nostalgic reveries when I recall some of these discoveries. Most were English,
probably some American, very few Australian.
I was especially drawn to books that had a poignant,
nostalgic edge or tipped over into the darkness of the occult. Charley by Joan G. Robinson (now called The Girl Who Ran Away) is the wistful
tale of a runaway who moves into a chicken coop near the aunt she is convinced
does not want her, and gets to know the local community while playing a series
of fictional roles. A Candle in Her Room
was the darkest of Ruth M. Arthur’s haunting tales. It’s about several generations of an ancient Welsh family, all haunted by an evil doll called Dido; the spare illustrations
by Margery Gill were as important as the text. It’s out of print now, yet so
sought after that hardback copies in good condition sell online for as much as
two hundred and sixty five dollars.
It’s heartening – and very soulful in
Thomas Mann’s sense – to see the way the internet links older readers like me
with the past by making new and old editions of these books available, offering
Goodreads reviews and helping to jog our memories on titles and author names,
with a little help from Google. Just yesterday I tracked down the name of
another book I had loved, All About the Bullerby
Children by Astrid Lindgren.
It's no surprise that there's now a forum where members can
post requests for information about books they revered as children but have
forgotten the titles of. This is perfect for those books whose titles and authors have fled from the
memory forever, while the stories themselves, with their themes of loss and
longing, linger in the heart.
I remember being transfixed by the tale of a young girl who accidentally left her favourite doll in the park one sunny afternoon. When she realised what she’d done she and her nurse rushed back to search for it, but the doll was nowhere to be found. The months passed and the seasons turned, and yet the little girl always kept a lookout. The more time that passed, the more beautiful the doll became in the child’s mind, the grander her outfit, the brighter her eyes, the lusher her hair, until she was the very model of the perfect doll.
I remember being transfixed by the tale of a young girl who accidentally left her favourite doll in the park one sunny afternoon. When she realised what she’d done she and her nurse rushed back to search for it, but the doll was nowhere to be found. The months passed and the seasons turned, and yet the little girl always kept a lookout. The more time that passed, the more beautiful the doll became in the child’s mind, the grander her outfit, the brighter her eyes, the lusher her hair, until she was the very model of the perfect doll.
And then one day, in the middle of a heavy winter, on a
familiar walk in the park, the dog nosed out something under the snow – a
wrecked, sorry thing that might once have been a doll, its clothes in rags, its
shoes gone, wisps of hair and perhaps an eye missing. It was the little girl’s
doll. Could there be a harsher lesson than this, for both the heroine and the
reader, about the dangers of excessive imagination and the hard thud of reality
(if anyone by chance has any knowledge of this book please let me know)? And
doesn't this story resonate, making us think of old flames whose recent photos
convey a distressing physical deterioration compared with the idealised image
the mind has created.
The enduring charm of the library
Libraries are unique environments because they represent the communal spirit that made so much social progress possible in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries but is now under threat. If council-funded libraries had never been thought of up to now, and someone suggested them, the idea would be labelled bolshie, radical and socialist by the loony right. Libraries represent what we can achieve when we pool our resources for a common good.
Libraries are unique environments because they represent the communal spirit that made so much social progress possible in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries but is now under threat. If council-funded libraries had never been thought of up to now, and someone suggested them, the idea would be labelled bolshie, radical and socialist by the loony right. Libraries represent what we can achieve when we pool our resources for a common good.
When the conservative Coalition fought its successful election
campaign in the state of Victoria in 2010, it failed to mention that it planned
to slash funding to local libraries. In 2011 councils were left reeling when
they were told that recurrent funding for public library operating costs would be cut by up to $7.1 million over four years. There was so much outcry that the
government quickly backtracked, providing assurances that the funding would be maintained
while it undertook a review of Victorian library services and funding
arrangements; the fight is not over yet. (In the meantime it took an axe to
TAFE colleges, but that’s another story.)
I’m always heartened by the sight of people kicking back in
libraries and reading the paper at the communal tables, or poring over a novel
in a secluded corner. I find this very hard to do myself. For some reason I can
only relax to that extent at home, but for me, these communal readers are part
of what makes the library worth going to. Because my local library is currently
closed for renovations I go to a newly built one in Camberwell. It’s spacious
and tall-ceilinged, and there are cushy beanbags arranged against one of the
walls, inviting you to plump down and wile away an hour with the printed word.
I haven’t seen anyone on those beanbags as yet; I’d like to think that when the
nearby primary school finishes up every afternoon the local kids come streaming
in and head for the beanbags, but if they do I bet they use them to play on
their tablets and smart phones.
I still believe in serendipity, still comb the shelves for new
discoveries; one of my recent browses yielded This Is How by M.J. Hyland and Mad Women: The Other Side of Life on Madison Avenue in the '60s and Beyond, by Jane Haas. But I understand I can't rely on chance alone for my book thrills; I reserve books I've
read about on the review pages of the weekend papers. I’ve just finished my
library copy of Kate Atkinson's excellent Life
after Life and I’ll be reading Christos Tsiolkas’s latest book Barracuda that way too, but I think I’ll
be in for a long wait.
I am as hopelessly addicted to the mixed-lollies potential of libraries as I ever was as a child, and after all these years I do not have the willpower to borrow only as many books as I have the time to read (I will often borrow new books while there are others sitting at home unread from last time). There are always a few that I have to return without having read them, having gone through the two renewals that are usually permitted.
I am as hopelessly addicted to the mixed-lollies potential of libraries as I ever was as a child, and after all these years I do not have the willpower to borrow only as many books as I have the time to read (I will often borrow new books while there are others sitting at home unread from last time). There are always a few that I have to return without having read them, having gone through the two renewals that are usually permitted.
Memories of libraries past
I actually worked in a council library service for a year, in 1985.
I lived with my parents and saved up for a five-month trip to Europe. I am glad
I did this because it satisfied my curiosity – I decided I didn’t want to
become a librarian, it was too dull. I did little else but shelve books, mend
them, and check them in and out. However, although I was a library assistant only, because I had
an arts degree I was allowed to do the occasional reference query; this was the
1985 version of googling and made a nice change from the endless wielding of the computer wand.
Now I curse my lack of imagination – this was an era before libraries had started holding the book discussions, author talks, adult storytimes and competitions that now pepper their calendars. If I’d thought about it I could have livened up ‘sleepy hollow’, our fond name for our branch library, which was surrounded by a vibrant Jewish community and not far away from the arty grunginess of St Kilda.
Now I curse my lack of imagination – this was an era before libraries had started holding the book discussions, author talks, adult storytimes and competitions that now pepper their calendars. If I’d thought about it I could have livened up ‘sleepy hollow’, our fond name for our branch library, which was surrounded by a vibrant Jewish community and not far away from the arty grunginess of St Kilda.
But I was only 22 after all. It took all my willpower to
stay in the job because I had a bad case of love shyness (love avoidance would
be more accurate) powered by OCD, panic and social anxiety. My fears centred on the young gay man whose job it was to transfer the books from one library branch to the
next. He always did his rounds in the early afternoon and I would blush
furiously when the glass doors swung open and he waltzed in. He ended up
thinking I hated him, as I bristled if he approached me; the opposite was the
case, I was a little in love with him, everybody was, but I couldn't and still
find it hard to distinguish sexual feelings from feelings of love. He had so
much life force in him, I could see it in the challenge of his liquid dark
eyes, which reflected both a sense of anarchy and a narcissism that was forgivable
– he resembled a short, slightly built version of James Dean, but was better looking.
My fantasies of him were fairly chaste; we played hide-and-seek in a huge
mansion with sweeping staircase and enormous chintz curtains of pale gold. When this clip for the new Tears for Fears single ‘Head over heels’ first
played on Countdown while both of us were still slaves to the library service, I felt as if the
yearnings of my soul had been bared for the entire world to see. Needless to say such tumultous emotions have done nothing to reduce the charm of libraries for me (he was only the first of a short series of male library workers I had crushes on; the women were unexciting).